Archive for the 'English' Category

Can a list tell a story? Yes, it can. Look.

Thanks to search, lists have become ubiquitous. They are everywhere. Surely they have always been a cultural technique, but as the digital is spreading, they have became more and more important. Which is usually not seen as a good thing. Isn’t the list another sign of knowledge becoming shallow?

It is true, at first sight it doesn’t seem as if the list is a complex thing. In the past they have told us that there was just one position important on the list, and that is to be number one. Lists were there for ranking. Or even more simple, to register something. A shopping list. For sure, a list isn’t seen as a complex or even poetic technique. That might be a mistake.

At the moment Taryn Simon turns this prejudice upside down in her excellent art work ‘A Living Man Declared Dead And Other Chapters I-XVIII’, which should be looked at in the Tate Modern (or in the Neue Nationalgallerie in Berlin in September). I am still impressed with her multilayered approach of photography. She is reporting in a very journalistic way what this thing is, ‘life’, and what we do to each other while living – Simon has worked for the New York Times magazine before becoming an artist.

An artist she is. There are lists everywhere but the lists aren’t behaving. The stories her lists tell are grouped around families, orphans, concerned persons, political issues, individual cases and rabbits. Nepal girls that are thought to be the living goddess Kumari until they menstruate and become a normal person again. Two Brazilian feuding families. A huge Kenyan polygamy family. Ukraine orphans that are forced to leave the sheltered orphanage with 16 with the high probability of then being trafficked.

Simon tells all these stories by creating lists. She proves that lists are a much more complex format than we ever thought; for example, when suddenly in the middle of one list another story evolves – like the absent pictures of three children of a Kenyan doctor for fear of being kidnapped by the father.

Will lists ever become a highly regarded cultural technique? How are media changing the way we tell stories and narrations? And will I ever be able to escape the algorithms?

Sorry, but I have to ask myself that question for today I made an exception, and exchanged my extended living room, the British Library, with the Tate Modern. Usually, I am quite concentrated on my manuscript these days hiding from social contacts like a mole. I ended up noticing something which is very much about my book topic on how algorithms are changing our society. Obviously, I went outside but the mole came along. Well, I suppose we will both go and watch Barcelona vs. ManU then.

How to tell a Facebook story?

Being forced to stay in due to my cold instead of haunting Berlin, Mr. Bleed & me watched the Facebook movie yesterday, the Social Network. And well.. It’s okayish, but I predict it will be done again. The movie is told way too conventional and leaves lots of creative possibilities; something like Facebook asks for it, really. Isn’t the social THE story?

The chance was to turn the rise of a social relations network into a story of a new social narration itself, and to experiment with narration. The new social that unfolds with Facebook aks for a new, an own narration.

Instead we get the usual patterns. A frame setting of a not relevant love story; the boring initiations of college movies; the outsider pattern, here the nerd vs. the popular sporty rich twins; two not very exciting lawsuits, and Ex-Napster Shawn Fanning as a buying-rounds-of-greenish-cocktails-jackass. Oh, dear.

It’s okay, but this can be done better. The blueprint, which was the book “The Accidental Billionaires: The Founding of Facebook. A Tale of Sex, Money, Genius and Betrayal”, is just too lost in clichées really, and no good ones. Take the disastrous role of females. None. At least Sorkin/Fincher didn’t focus on the fact that females have boobs and can kiss each other, which obviously is an important insight of the book.

So what do we learn? It’s better to write code than be an employee.
However, if you are a social autist people will still find you creepy even if you are a billionaire. You don’t need to be a coding brain to launch a disruptive business – for doing Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg just bought Perl for dummies. Finally, girls need to start coding when having a crush or being heartbroken.

By the way, this is Mark’s version of the story which he told about a year ago.

Dear Google, please be evil

In Germany, home builders protest agitatedly against Google Street View. The strong outrage might seem to be a bit weird as people often they make a plea against Google in the news being photographed in front of their house, but the moment they protest against is comprehensible. They are worried about Google controlling public space, and rightly so.

In the US, Google’s and Verizon’s proposal to turn away from net neutrality when it comes to wireless broadband has promptly evoked a storm protests in the whole world. More than ever, the digital access of information is political, and the ideal of equality is set aside.

Much like a work of art was never just another commodity, information isn’t just another product. Information is political, it conditions our society. Democracy is built on information. And not a public institution, but Google is managing that information. It isn’t just another brand. 75% internet users use Google. Much like Facebook or Apple it became an online nation.

When Sergej Brin and Larry Page founded the company, they wanted to make all the information on the internet accessible. Some years ago, however, we users decided to use search differently. When we use Google these days, we don’t search anymore the internet. When we don’t know something, we ask the internet. The internet became the index of the world. This is why we should be alert.

You confuse me! Or when private behaves like public

It is not that we have to throw our hands up in horror because the access of information is controlled privately. After all, newspapers have been private for good reasons. The problem is 1 that newspapers, television, institutions that are out there to control Google are about to become digital themselves, and are 2 therefore depending on the quasi-monopoly Google, a 3 quasi-monopoly that is in fact serving the public giving not a lot of reasons to oppose it.

Look, for example, here as flood disaster in Pakistan is entering a new dimension with more than 20 million people affected. Google is not only launching a crisis page that somehow steps in the role of news organisations who have been in command of writing contemporary history so far, adding new digital tools they developed like a resource finder for NGOs and person finder. Google is also trying to use their satellite capacity to help with pictures, something that the cloud coverage has prevented so far.

It is true that companies have responded to disasters before, and offered help. Most of the time these were disasters they felt somewhat connected to, or thought that a social gesture was good for their image. They didn’t actually establish an own permanent crisis response team that develops tools and uses Google technology to help, eh, society. Is Google a public service?

It is often behaving like one, but it isn’t. Much like newspapers and their separation of content and advertising Google is in fact already living up to stronger ethical standards than normal companies, but is that enough?

Who controls our frienemy?

As a company, Google can easily change its mind, like they did with tracking users.

Last week, the Wall Street Journal published parts of an internal Google “vision statement” debating possibilities how to track users. As some of you might know, Google resisted for years using any method to track people online without their knowledge at the fierce insistence of founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, as Jessica E. Vascellaro puts it in her interesting article.

Instead of tracking the user, Google used search terms and focused on contextual advertising only. The WSJ piece looks behind the Google scene reporting the debates going on between the founders, and the final decision to buy DoubleClick Inc.

The important thing isn’t really to see Google making up its mind to move from contextual advertising to target advertising introducing the cookie in March 2009, but to get evidence that the company is struggling with its role, and decided to move into cookie business. This is the problem.

As the internet became the index to our world, and Google is managing that index, who controls Google? This question is clearly not enough on our minds.

Sometimes I catch myself thinking: Dear Google, please be a bit more evil.

WSJ: What they know
WSJ: Interview with Eric Schmidt

Thx

It is important to dance on top of the world from time to time, and we planned on going that night. Now in London this is not so easy. Like for example Fabric might be a club with an amazing soundsystem, but lacks the creative roughness of a Berlin club. Yes, I know I am spoiled from living there fore too long. But Fabric is a professional entertainment stage there to produce your clinical entertainment event, and events don’t like to be staged, the less in a clinical environment. Events like to catch you off guard to take action, connect with a crowd, and deny to follow a plan. Here goes the Saturday night, good bye top of the world, was what I was thinking.

Moderat – Rusty Nails (Shackleton Remix) by Nialler9

Suddenly the sound became thick, dense, and dark making its way across the whole range of the soundsystem. Soon its complexity, the one that made us dance, curated the crowd, sorted it out until only those who know moved across the dancefloor to the straight dubstep, here and there broken by a soundwall that gave way to new fragments of the musical structure, cut by a sharp twisted snare or accompanied by poetry.

This music tried to break the conventional structure of electronic music, the loop. A bit like the tracks of James Blake, it seemed to be composed in a new style, its fragments diffunding, playing with each other, interacting, behaving more like a tag cloud. The elements of the live set were not shifting in the foreground and background like usually in electronic music. It was engineered in a different way. New. We were standing in the music, dancing, making way, moving through an annoying, complex, beautiful, aggressive and pure sound. The soundtrack of the 21st century.

Sometimes In Autumn (Shackleton Remix) by ishmo kayor

When Shackleton finished playing his two hour live set, the crowd applauded very long, then left immidiatly. On our way home through the morning light, I finally understood what had happened, when A. said the words to describe what was going on: “I am shocked.”, she said. We were, and still exchanging comments full of joy on the next day. Oh, music.





The Friday Night Parties – Wolfgang Tillmans v Efdemin

I am going to split myself in halves today. One part of me will enjoy Wolfgang Tillmans’ order of things in his new show at the Serpentine Gallery in London. The Guardian’s art critic Adrian Searle found a wonderful way to describe Wolfgang’s bewildering orchestra of sujets, and later on we will dance the night away to have a bit of a midsummer party – this a picture that Wolfgang took in the morning last year. Could be Berlin, eh?

This is where my other half will go: In the early morning, the walls of the Berlin Panoramabar of Berghain will shout for joy to the sound of “Chicago“. It will be quite a night. Efdemin celebrates his record release party, and it is a breathtaking album. Sound art you want to dance to, basically, as Efdemin imports the detailed treatment of beats we know from the likes of Photek and transfers it to modulate the sound of techno. This is taking house to a new, abstract, complex, and ecstatic level. If you listen to Night Train, you can already see it all: the hands up in the air, the chary morning light, the people filled with joy in Panoramabar.

One day in a not so far away future, biotechnology will take us to another level. Then I will split myself in two halves like a double helix, and I will say to myself: Tonight, we are going to have fun.

Find his beautiful video of “Chicago” further down here, or get an idea of what I am talking about by looking at the unofficial version of Wonderland that someone uploaded on YouTube.

Open data? Fine. But available isn’t accessible

Technology has become ubiquitous, a potential our society is rather ignoring at the moment. Think about it.

We spend most of our work day in front of a screen, some of our friends never stop to Twitter, most of them check their emails on their blackberry even when drunk, and now we grab the iPad on the weekend in our leisure time. But what does it really mean for our societies to be surrounded by this new digital technology? What chances lie there in being surrounded by computers? This is a question, we barely think about. Not good. At the moment, we can see some serious potential we are about to miss.

Conrad Wolfram pointed out some of them at the inspiring Computational Knowledge Summit in London as to know in the future will be a mix of knowledge and computation. “High power computation is now available for everyone”, he said. “We need to understand what that really means for life and knowledge and expertise. In the past high power computation had to be done by experts. What do we really need to learn, how has that changed?”

He was delivering the very important context to WolframAlpha, a knowledge engine that gives an idea about to where this thing with digitalisation could be taken. It is an approach to make available knowledge also accessible. Because what does open government data really mean today?

We all welcome that governments publish their data, but it is not enough to open a box. We have to take the data out. “Available doesn’t always equal democratised”, Conrad Wolfram said. A very true sentence.

In a world of information overload, available isn’t accessible anymore.

So how can we unlock the knowledge assets of digitalisation? One answer might be to re-think our publishing strategy. As Conrad Wolfram said, we should think about publish in applications, and not in publications. Here, designing a good interface is more important than ever to set a technical potential free. Think of the iPhone: The technology of the iPhone was there before Apple came to unlock it. It was curating and design, who brought smartphones to the masses and made the computer truly a mobile little thing.

Today, to develop and design an application is not anymore just a business. Shouldn’t we start to see it as a political contribution?

Here computes everybody! The computational knowledge engine WolframAlpha announces plans to reach out to the user

The presentation of search results in a list is utterly outdated. Barely has any format survived the disruptive dynamic of the internet that long, and when it comes to Stephen Wolfram of WolframAlpha, it will not survive that much longer.

Yesterday, and about a year after he launched WolframAlpha to change search engines from delivering links to real answers, he announced the next steps. To built up momentum, his project introduces a new strategy: Easy to use, just do it yourself.

To reach out to the user, WolframAlpha plans to introduce three innovations: Firstly, the user will soon be able to upload own data that the computational knowledge engine WolframAlpha will then analyze; furthermore WolframAlpha makes it possible for users to create their own answer-widgets on the fly to embed them on their own sites, and finally WolframResearch will take visualization further so that everyone can embed a 3D model player to get lost in 3D rendering. Yes, WolframAlpha takes the user-centered approach.

Build your own little Wolfram

Indeed, WolframAlpha fights a problem that is similar to the one Twitter has: While it is highly respected among geeks, the average user doesn’t get it. Giving the user the chance to built its own widget shall change that, that’s the first step of the plan.

At the Computational Knowledge Summit in London yesterday, Stephen Wolfram shows a demo of the next steps. “In less than a minute you can soon deploy a piece of computation”, he says and starts right away.

For creating a little widget on the fly, he uses a new command “create a new template”. He then quickly types in the query “distance between San Francisco and London”, and presses “test this query”. Automatically the next step “use this query to create a template” comes up. He decides to make it more random, and switches within the template both cities, San Francisco and London, to “any city”, and presents an html-code to embed. The Wolfram widget is ready.

“With WolframAlpha we are trying to deliver something that you can build sort of the fly. Now we take this mass customized piece of creativity further”, Stephen Wolfram said.

To download from or upload your own computational data to WolframAlpha, for example. Answers to queries like the statistics of the search for “BP vs Exxon” or country statistics delivered from “how many sheep in the UK” – will soon become downloadable for the user in formats which are easy to compute further. Also, the user can soon upload his own data and run it through a WolframAlpha analysis.

“We also plan a big version of what we’ve been doing for larger organisations and companies, where we take a WolframAlpha customer version that operates internal data”, he said. “The intention is that these things will be widely available.”

Can data visualization become iPhone easy?

Finally, he talks about a third novelty WolframResearch is planning, a Mathematica player that could be embedded on webpages to take the visualization of data further. The computational software program Mathematica that Stephen Wolfram also lies at the heart of WolframAlpha and is used for a lot of computing.

Soon, a browser plugin can turn a 3D model to an interactive experience, and every user can play around with a random variable, able to see the results immediately. “It’s still up in the air”, Stephen Wolfram says, “but it will be free to download and free to use for non-commercial publishers, with the intention to make it widely available.”

Will Wolfram’s vision become reality? With Mathematica he showed that he is capable of building something big in the world of science and finance and everywhere else where number crunching is important, but to take WoframAlpha to the masses depends on a whole range of factors.

For sure, computational knowledge like WolframAlpha is an option to watch, the more if it becomes iPhone easy to use.

Where do we wanna go tomorrow?

Traced some futuristic moments in technology during the past weeks for the Guardian. Thought it might be a good idea to gather them here.

How Facebook and Twitter could save us from dreaded email overload
In today’s state of information overload, it might be useful to reintroduce restrictions on who people can communicate with

Will journalists of the future need to know how to code?
First they were told to blog, then they had to be on Facebook and Twitter. Now coding is the latest trend among journalists

What Apple can do for journalism
If publishers take their chance with Apple, iTunes can offer 100 million accounts with credit card information. Yes, you read it correctly: 100 million

How journalists can use augmented reality
The world with subtitles is about to get real. And it has much to offer for journalistic interventions

Fashion. Or what in the end is human?

agambenmcqueen2
Homo sapiens, then, is neither a clearly defined species nor a substance; it is, rather, a machine or device for producing the recognition of the human. In line with the taste of the epoch, the anthropogenic (…) machine is an optical one (…). It is an optical machine constructed of a series of mirrors in which man, looking at himself, sees his own image always already deformed in the features of an ape. Homo is a constitutively ‘anthropormorphous’ animal (…), who must recognize himself in a non-man in order to be human.
Giorgio Agamben, The Open. Man and Animal. Stanford University Press 2004, 26-27

Alexander McQueen just created the movie/fashion show to this quote. At least in the first two-thirds. Amazingly brilliant art. Watch it here. In addition, that can be understood as an example of Jan Joswigs call for a fashion that uses its craft for questioning immanent ideologies, and is asking for a utopian transformation. What? I approve this message, of course. Like totally.

Normal is the new cool. But what is normal?

.

Had to watch again and again “So Fine” from director Katherine Nolfi for the Brooklyn Noise Pop Band Telepathe because I didn’t know what fascinated me. Obviously for the young New Yorkers normal is very explicitly the new cool, but that wasn’t the reason. I knew that trend already at least for a year. This video here claims more – and that’s what makes it interesting. Along the way it claims that cross dressing is the new normal, still life is the new everyday, overloaded is the new minimal and that formation dancing is the thing of an indie band. It turns the world subtly upside down. Always liked that. So normal is the new cool. But are you sure what is normal?

If I was a painting I would rather like to illustrate a novel than to match a sofa

When a couple of years ago the art world turned its attention towards narration again, romanticism and filigree drawings returned. This focus on the poetical side of art was quickly answered by a sympathetic low-keyed counter movement which introduced a touch of vulgarity and kitsch to balance what was happening. But basically every picture told a story. Well, where to go from here?

kerstinkartscher

Gunter Reski and Marcus Weber, both amazing painters, just gave us an answer. At Jet on the corner of Alexanderplatz, they curated an exhibition which focusses on „Le Capitaine Pamphile“, a novel of Alexandre Dumas from 1839. Their idea was to invite artists and ask them to respond to that mixture of travel adventure and fanciful animal memoir. Weber and Reski prepared a storyboard to create a loose superstructure and used the narrative moments of that very pictorial novel.

The outcome is really worthwhile watching, as a lively crowd recognised yesterday at the opening of „The Pamphile Show“. Awesome for Americans, lovely for the English and supersuper for the Hipsters. So if you are in Berlin before July 18th, go, have a look and enjoy.
[Memhardstr. 1, Thur-Sat 4-7pm]

ausstellung pamphileshow

Obama is a popstar. And he is very good at it.

We laughed a lot in the office looking at the new coffee table book showing our chancellor in faked private situations. Well, Merkel doesn’t like cameras, she is for sure not a media chancellor like Schroeder. But anyway, unfortunatly no german politician has the confidence to be as humorously and witty as Obama was at the annual White House Correspondents’ Association dinner on Saturday. Saying things like:

“I would like to talk about what my administration plans to achieve in the next 100 days –During the second 100 days, we will design, build and open a library dedicated to my first 100 days.” And .. “I believe that my next 100 days will be so successful, I will be able to complete them in 72 days. And on the 73rd day I will rest.” :)

Here is part 1, worthwhile watching.

Interesting by the way, that the speech has kind of two parts. After all this joking it gets really serious in minute 4 of part 2, when he starts to talk about the crisis of newspapers in the US.

Some newspapers are struggeling simply to stay open and”… not every ending will be a happy one”(4.40) — “Your ultimate success as an industy is essential to the success of democracy” (5:00) — quoting Thomas Jefferson saying, when he has the choice to choose a goverment without newspapers or a newspaper without a goverment, he wouldn’t hesistate to do the latter (5.20) — and getting kind of Obama-pathetic when pledging towards the ideals of journalism: “..you help all of us to serve at the pleasure of the american people do our jobs better. By holding us accountable, by demanding honesty, by preventing us from taking shortcuts and falling into easy political games that people are so desperatley wiery of. And that kind of reporting is worth preserving. Not just for your sake, but for the publics.” (6:10).

Word up. — But all this makes me think, how different the political role is. Being funny is part of being an american president. Maybe european politicans should copy that. If they can. Is the role of a politician in europe so different? Or is it the job – and intelligent and funny people rather go somewhere else? Hm.